tripod joints |
Post Reply |
Author | |
keshav_vats_oo7
Double Secret Probation Joined: Jul/21/2020 Location: India Status: Offline Points: 7 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: Jul/23/2020 at 2:51am |
How about using tripods on both inboard and outboard sides. It will cut a lot of weight and allow a significant amount of plunge. Angular variation can be the issue, we are trying to implement the same can someone please tell its disadvantages.
- Keshav
|
|
RLM
Baja Godfather Joined: Nov/15/2012 Location: Hamilton, ON Status: Offline Points: 1258 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
play around with your suspension geometry and the location of your inboard CV's try and reduce the angles of the shafts to as little as possible. this will help eleminate some plunge. an easy way of doing this is by moving the inners as close to the center of the car as you can.
|
|
McMaster Baja Racing (09-Dec 2015)
Team Captain 2012-2015 Suspension Lead 2015-2016 All spoonfeed PM requests will be billed at $10 USD per reply, payable via paypal. |
|
ankitk
Welding Master Joined: Jul/17/2013 Status: Offline Points: 108 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
How would one eliminate plunge during suspension travel? By Introducing a camber during travel? or is there any other way
|
|
RLM
Baja Godfather Joined: Nov/15/2012 Location: Hamilton, ON Status: Offline Points: 1258 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
we ran a suspension that by its geometry has a lot of plunge i oder to get the other characteristics we wanted. what we found is one of the Bombardier Can-Am products runs a rzheppa style CV pair where both the inner AND outter are capable of plunge. the entire setup can accomidate for up to 3 inches if my memory serves me correctly, as well as can handle some good angles at each end. The downside was that thiese joints were fairly heavy compaired to other rzheppa joints on the market. another option we considered for a future modification (note we ended up changing the geometry instead) was to use a regular rzheppa joint pair that could handle the angles we needed and then install a telescoping shaft to handle the plunge.
Rich Elliott McMaster Baja Racing 2009-2013 2012-2014 Captain
|
|
McMaster Baja Racing (09-Dec 2015)
Team Captain 2012-2015 Suspension Lead 2015-2016 All spoonfeed PM requests will be billed at $10 USD per reply, payable via paypal. |
|
zglazer
Baja Godfather Joined: May/27/2012 Location: Metro Detroit Status: Offline Points: 593 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
That's what most teams do as far as I'm aware...
|
|
Zack Glazer
McGill Baja Racing Alumnus 2009-2013 http://baja.mcgilleus.ca/ 2012-2013 Drivetrain Designer |
|
abhinav.chiku
Milling Master Joined: Aug/04/2012 Location: India Status: Offline Points: 54 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Otto.
I was thinking of using CV(Rzheppa joints) at both ends while considering the suspension geometry and reducing the net plunge throughout the travel and accomodating it in axle plunge since there is no tripod. Is that not advisable. |
|
Abhinav Jain
Captain Team Kshatriya International VIT University India |
|
otto
Milling Master Joined: Oct/06/2011 Location: OR & Colorado Status: Offline Points: 100 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Wait, are you saying you will run a tripod outboard (by the wheel) and a CV inboard (at your gearbox)? With CV joints (aka rzeppa) you normally have one fixed joint and one joint that can plunge.
|
|
Cornell Baja 2008-2012, suspension stuff
Oregon State 2012+, saw chain & some more baja |
|
Richie_Dagger
Baja Godfather Joined: Sep/25/2011 Location: Las Vegas, NV Status: Offline Points: 615 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Find how much plunge is required by your suspension for the range you want to run and compare that with how much plunge you can get out of your axle. If you need more plunge than you can get, you're in some trouble...
|
|
abhinav.chiku
Milling Master Joined: Aug/04/2012 Location: India Status: Offline Points: 54 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Basically, we are trying to eliminate the tripod joint in the gearbox end and replace it with Rzheppa joint to gain increased amount of allowable angle of the driveshaft to run smoothly. This where I and my team are not converging. I think eliminating the plunge, by the replacing the tripod joint, won't affect us in any major way because the suspension geometry in the rear 3 link trailing link, is set to induce very little forces on driveshaft. So I basically am favoring Rzheppa at both ends to get larger permissible driveshaft angle.
Is that harmful in any way, or is it something not advisable. P.S.- Vitesh is in my team.
|
|
Abhinav Jain
Captain Team Kshatriya International VIT University India |
|
otto
Milling Master Joined: Oct/06/2011 Location: OR & Colorado Status: Offline Points: 100 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Plunging shouldn't cause any axial load, if that is what you're asking. Unless of course you are exceeding the amount of permissible plunge...
|
|
Cornell Baja 2008-2012, suspension stuff
Oregon State 2012+, saw chain & some more baja |
|
zmpeck
Organizer Joined: Aug/29/2009 Status: Offline Points: 40 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The amount of plunge depends on your suspension geometry, and can be designed to virtually zero if you wish to so.
|
|
Vitesh
Bolt Sorter Joined: Jul/20/2013 Status: Offline Points: 15 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
what effect will be seen if the tripod joints used on the gearbox side of the driveshaft are replaced with rzeppa joint?
because we are compromising the plunging action of tripod with higher angles available in rzeppa. How much is the plunging action for any car and what if the plunging action is restricted. Because i think the rzeppa will have to bear more loads as plunging action is restricted and thus it may fail. any ideas regarding this??
|
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |